<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Video in your new media tool kit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aboutfacedigital.com/blog/2006/10/25/is-video-in-your-new-media-tool-kit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aboutfacedigital.com/blog/2006/10/25/is-video-in-your-new-media-tool-kit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 05:48:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: beta</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutfacedigital.com/blog/2006/10/25/is-video-in-your-new-media-tool-kit/comment-page-1/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>beta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutfacedigital.com/blog/2006/10/25/is-video-in-your-new-media-tool-kit/#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>good post paul&lt;br/&gt;you should take a look to our new web service in Beta named rec2mail.com&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;it might interest you&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;best&lt;br/&gt;jean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good post paul<br />you should take a look to our new web service in Beta named rec2mail.com</p>
<p>it might interest you</p>
<p>best<br />jean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Dunay</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutfacedigital.com/blog/2006/10/25/is-video-in-your-new-media-tool-kit/comment-page-1/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Dunay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutfacedigital.com/blog/2006/10/25/is-video-in-your-new-media-tool-kit/#comment-1052</guid>
		<description>Yes Rob - as you can tell I am NOT convinced of the benefit for ads layered on top of video. Its too soft for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Rob &#8211; as you can tell I am NOT convinced of the benefit for ads layered on top of video. Its too soft for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Dunay</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutfacedigital.com/blog/2006/10/25/is-video-in-your-new-media-tool-kit/comment-page-1/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Dunay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutfacedigital.com/blog/2006/10/25/is-video-in-your-new-media-tool-kit/#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>Yes posting FULL transcripts to your RSS feed on when you launch these videos is one work around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes posting FULL transcripts to your RSS feed on when you launch these videos is one work around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris@SearchingWorks</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutfacedigital.com/blog/2006/10/25/is-video-in-your-new-media-tool-kit/comment-page-1/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris@SearchingWorks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutfacedigital.com/blog/2006/10/25/is-video-in-your-new-media-tool-kit/#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>Excellent post - I guess we should all run out and purchase digital video cams.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;An additional thought: &lt;br/&gt;Integrated Marketing is Good&lt;br/&gt;Integrated and Sticky is Better&lt;br/&gt;Integrated, Sticky and Indexed (by search engines) is best... &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Needless to say, video indexing is not  comprehensive yet (at least as far as I know).  However, there are some quick workarounds that allow video content to be visible to search engines as well. (i.e. synopses, transcripts etc.)  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Chris Biber&lt;br/&gt;www.searchingworks.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post &#8211; I guess we should all run out and purchase digital video cams.  </p>
<p>An additional thought: <br />Integrated Marketing is Good<br />Integrated and Sticky is Better<br />Integrated, Sticky and Indexed (by search engines) is best&#8230; </p>
<p>Needless to say, video indexing is not  comprehensive yet (at least as far as I know).  However, there are some quick workarounds that allow video content to be visible to search engines as well. (i.e. synopses, transcripts etc.)  </p>
<p>Chris Biber<br /><a href="http://www.searchingworks.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchingworks.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob O'Regan</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutfacedigital.com/blog/2006/10/25/is-video-in-your-new-media-tool-kit/comment-page-1/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob O'Regan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutfacedigital.com/blog/2006/10/25/is-video-in-your-new-media-tool-kit/#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>Good post, Paul. And it&#039;s important for marketers to not view online video only as a vehicle to carry pre-roll or text ads - that&#039;s the old model. They need their brands to become part of that Multi Sensory experience, not layer ads on top of someone else&#039;s experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Paul. And it&#8217;s important for marketers to not view online video only as a vehicle to carry pre-roll or text ads &#8211; that&#8217;s the old model. They need their brands to become part of that Multi Sensory experience, not layer ads on top of someone else&#8217;s experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
